What is the Best OS for Squid?

This is an all-time favourite FAQ, bound to show up every month or so on the Squid Users mailing-list. Let's try to dispel some myths first, and clarify first and foremost what OS are not suited for running Squid. You might want to avoid:

  1. Commodore (VIC20, 64,128) OSes - YMMV on Amiga systems. Status is unclear on Sinclairs and Spectrums.
  2. Palm OS and other palmtop systems, including PocketPC, Symbian and TRon. We have no success stories on the Sharp Zaurus yet (but also no mention of failures)
  3. Non network-capable operating systems or devices (but this is mainly a matter of futility)

In some people's opinions, you might also want to avoid

  1. Microsoft Windows Server Family
  2. Microsoft Windows client systems

While this is probably true for those outfits who desire to obtain the highest possible performance, not all do and it might be perfectly reasonable to run Squid on MS-Windows systems in some environments (a small office comes to mind as the perfect example).

What about Unices?

Generally speaking, any modern Unix or Unix-like operating system will offer similarly good performance. A technically sensible administrator will choose the best tool for the job, which means whatever OS she is most comfortable with.

For reference we maintain an incomplete list of OS where Squid is known to be popular. Where possible there are also OS pages here in the wiki with extra information.




  • AIX
  • HP-UX
  • IRIX
  • SCO Unix
  • Solaris

  • OmniOS
  • OpenIndiana

  • OSF/Digital Unix/Tru64

Windows: (Cygwin and MinGW)

  • Windows 2000 Server
  • Windows NT
  • Windows XP Server
  • Windows 2003 Server
  • Windows Vista Server


  • OS/2

Tuning for More

What matters the most to obtain the most out of any setup is to properly tune a few parameters. In priority order:

  • amount of physical memory available
    • the more the better, squid performance will suffer badly if parts of it are swapped out of core memory
  • CPU speed and core count
    • few faster cores are better than many slow cores. SMP Squid can currently operate most efficiently with 4-8 cores of 3GHz or more. multi-tenant installations are better for machinery with very many cores.
    • only the physical cores are useful, hyper-threaded "cores" can actually be worse.
  • Number of harddrives used for cache and their architecture
    • squid disk access patterns hit particularly hard RAID systems - especially RAID4/5. Since the data are not by definition valuable, it is recommended to run the cache_dirs on JBOD 1 (see SquidFaq/RAID)

    • of course the disk type matters: SCSI performs better than ATA, 15kRPM is better than 5.4kRPM, etc.
  • noatime mount option
    • atime is just useless for cache data - squid does its own timestamping, mounting the filesystem with the noatime option just saves a whole lot of writes to the disks
  • amount of space used
    • always leave about 20% of free space on the filesystems containing your cache_dirs: generally FS performance degrades dramatically if used space exceeds 80%
  • type of filesystem
    • only applies on OSes which offer multiple choices (except for a few really bad choices of FS). see below.

On systems with synchronous directory updates (Solaris, some BSD versions)

  • mount option to enable asynchronous directory updates, or preferably a filesystem meta journal on a separate device taking the heat of directory updates.

But I want to use foofs for my cache_dirs, it will perform best!

In case you didn't read the previous paragraph, please do! In case you still believe it makes much of a difference, here's some tips:

  • Linux
    • Reiserfs
      • reiserfs3 works just fine, it's recommended that you mount with noatime and notail options, and for the performance freaks put the journal on a different spindle

    • ext4
      • no data. we are looking for some ext4 experienced users to send tuning details in (if any!).
    • ext3
      • another fine blend, the defaults filesystem creation parameters are just good for squid - watch out for the number of inodes - squid cached objects are usually about 12-16kb in size, make sure you have enough. Consider using a rock cache_dir if you run into inode problems.

    • ext2
      • well, ext2 is a venerable good filesystem. But do you really want to wait for hours while your FS is being checked?
    • everything else
      • see the note about "really bad choices" above.
  • Solaris
    • UFS
      • the old Solaris File System, which good and stable. Use "noatime" as mount option.
    • ZFS
      • if you want really high performance for your Squid Cache, and dont mind bug 2313 (which is not related to ZFS on Solaris).

      • ZFS is included in Solaris beginning with Solaris 10. Release 6/06. Use "noatime" as mount option.
      • Set logbias property for ZFS to "throughput" when zfs fs for cache created on hardware RAID level 5 and above to avoid much TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS.
      • more about ZFS: http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/zfs_learning_center.jsp

  1. just a bunch of disks, in other words NO RAID (1)

BestOsForSquid (last edited 2016-09-29 13:43:01 by YuriVoinov)